Tuesday, October 12, 2021

Political extremism and hyperpartisanship are threats to our democracy



February 2021

As a father of three, all currently in college, I must find hope where I can, including in this axiom, often misattributed to Winston Churchill: “If you’re not a liberal at 20 you have no heart; if you’re not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”

Like her father, my daughter is enamored by humanity’s limitless possibilities for goodness. And we are proud of Emma’s boundless optimism. For Christmas this year she received President Obama’s book “A Promised Land.” Now 11 months into COVID, books don’t lay around for long without being read.

Throughout, Obama acknowledges but does not address the schisms caused by the inherently conflicting perspectives of a chief executive and those in the legislature. While the American model of self-governance was designed to pit the branches against each other, one longs for the day when elected officials displayed a modicum of compromise, cooperation and mutual respect.

Despite serving in the Senate, Obama repeatedly misses that the interests of a senator or representative are very different from a president. When a president lays his hand to the inaugural pledge, an expiration clock starts. With only one shot at an extension, presidents begin with the end in sight, while national legislators repeatedly roll the stone of reelection up the hill, time and again.

Historically, some presidents used philosophical musings to inspire us with Technicolor views of what this glorious city on a hill could accomplish. Whether it was Jefferson’s ideal of equal rights, Kennedy’s Camelot and visions of lunar landings, or Reagan’s new day in America, a president can lift us up, commune with the larger “we” and nurture the national spirit.

You say you never compromise with the mystery tramp but now you realize, he’s not selling any alibis, as you stare into the vacuum of his eyes, and ask him, “Do you want to make a deal?” (Bob Dylan, Like a Rolling Stone). 

Meanwhile, most legislators wallow in a philosophically monochromatic view of governing, engaged in a day-to-day grind of passing laws, securing pork and responding to constituents. Like a knife fight in a phone booth, legislators fight to live another day, struggling to stay on message, articulating complex policies and enduring the endless campaign.

You used to ride on a chrome horse with your diplomat. Ain’t it hard when you discover that, he really wasn’t where it’s at, after he took from you everything he could steal?

Today, party hyperpartisanship imposes ideological litmus tests on candidates.

History shows that democracies fail when political extremism abandons cooperation and compromise. During stressful times, democracies turn toward strongman leaders and right-wing authoritarianism. From ancient Rome to more modern Poland, Austria, Germany, France, Spain, Brazil, Chile, Venezuela, Egypt, Hungary, Nicaragua and most recently Myanmar, the history of democratic countries is they can easily devolve into dictatorships.

Once upon a time, you dressed so fine. Threw the bums a dime in your prime, didn’t you? People call, say “Beware doll, you’re bound to fall.” You thought they were all a-kiddin’ you. Now you don’t talk so loud. Now you don’t seem so proud.

In a 2020 report, The Economist finds that nearly 70% of nations are experiencing a decline in democratic principles, including the United States, France and Portugal.

Aw, you never turned around to see the frowns, on the jugglers and the clowns when they all did tricks for you.

And, right or left, it’s about time the middle began pushing back.

America needs a healthy two-party system that is actively engaged in a spirited, but civil, exchange of ideas. We need philosopher queens and kings whose visions of America’s future lead us out of our allegorical cave to the Technicolor “we.”

In his book, “The Vanishing American Adult,” Sen. Ben Sasse reintroduces traditional values outside the constraints of modern party fealty, by sharing a vision of healthy American conservatism focused on the rule of law, constitutionalism, unlimited human potential, extending the American dream to more and reviling a false potentate.

Who could be against the revival of a healthy conservative voice that is less isolated, less fearful and more generous in sharing the dreams of Jefferson, Madison and King?

This land is your land, this land is my land, from California to the New York Island. From the Redwood Forest to the Gulf Stream waters, this land was made for you and me (Woody Guthrie, This Land is Your Land). 

1 comment:

  1. JIM BECHTEL Feb 10, 2021 7:28am
    Thank you. Not sure I can identify all the song lyrics, but well done, sir.

    "Who could be against the revival of a healthy conservative voice ...?" I'm afraid we're about to find out.

    KevinK@up
    Kevin Kaup Feb 10, 2021 8:54am
    All Bob Dylan (Like a Rolling Stone) except for Woody Guthrie at the end. All aptly used here.

    GerardHarbison
    Gerard Harbison Feb 10, 2021 7:28am
    "If you’re not a liberal at 20 you have no heart; if you’re not a conservative at 40, you have no brain"

    No partisanship or extremism there!

    I suspect Mr. Galusha has neither heart nor brain.

    jsacco99
    Joe Sacco Feb 10, 2021 8:30am
    Perhaps the greatest challenge ahead of us will be defining what "the middle" truly means.

    JREGAN2
    JIM REGAN Feb 10, 2021 10:31am
    Mr. Galusha using President Obama as the example of a refusal to compromise ignores the history of Obama taking the unprecedented step of going to Congress in the earliest days of his presidency, only to be treated with utmost disdain by Republican leadership, whose response was that their only goal was to make him a 1 term President.

    Add in the fact that Obama's signature legislative achievement was enacted after hundreds of Congressional hearings and unlimited debate, and compare it to the Trump tax cuts which passed with no debate and without even a final written bill able to be reviewed before a vote was demanded, and his perspective seems flawed to me.

    If Mr Galusha wants to use more apropos song lyrics I suggest "Monster" by John Kay and Steppenwolf.

    troubat
    Tom Trouba Feb 10, 2021 12:16pm
    Jim, I know we have disagreed in the past but thumbs up for proposing an incredible song that is just as relevant today as it was when it was written 50+ years ago.

    RGALUSHA1
    Rick Galusha Feb 10, 2021 12:46pm
    It wasn't about Obama so much as it was about how some leaders can present a glorious vision of America could be, and how the vision of others is destroying our form of self-governance. Like each of us, Mr. Obama has human foibles - one of them being the unfortunate belief that he could sit down with those that disagreed with him and, using an intelligent argument, convince them to come around to his way of thinking. It was idealistic and, as pointed out in my opening comments, I suffered from the same "malady."

    Benjamin Johnson
    Benjamin Johnson Feb 10, 2021 2:30pm
    I'm not referring to any specific policy, but part of the problem is the person's insistence that they are "right" about the issue and that their reasoning is intelligent. It may be, but it also may not take into account the views or needs of the other person and thus it is not convincing. Even more so when it is a group of politicians arguing over a point, with different constituencies. For instance, you are late on your car payment and it seems to make sense that I should give you the money to make that car payment. Sounds good from your perspective, but idiotic from my perspective.

    ReplyDelete